shido
New Member
Posts: 28
|
PS3
Jul 17, 2006 23:00:48 GMT -5
Post by shido on Jul 17, 2006 23:00:48 GMT -5
well sgm u already know me from pc but now muahah i can spam on videogames too XD . but back to point this is about ps3 i want to start the offical ps3 thread on here WOOT ( i never get to start good threads anywhere lol) but yeah so lets make this a kick butt ps3 thread. so as we all know its coming out world wide in november of course japan gets it three days ahead of U.S i believe and of course europe gets it lasat . suposed to be a real hard core machine with REAL next gen having specs (yes i am a biased sony fanboy but what can i say WOOT BEST GAMES have come out on psone and 2 other then that only kick butt systems were snes and dreamcast) im hoping the online community will remain free like it was first stated and i also hope that its freeness doesnt interfere with its greatness . even tho im not an xbox fan they have done great things with xbox live and i can only hope that sony follows suit and improves. also hoping here thats the lawsuits with agere dont interfere with the pricing or releash of the ps3 or ps3 accessories . btw STop SUING SONY just becuz immerson won doesnt mean that u will XD as far as i know sony again has been robbed of exscuslive titles such as RE 5 and assasins cree , thank good konami and hideo are loyal to sony for the most part( cant blame them for the nintendo hookups i mean thats where mgs got its start ) games im lookin forward too are RE5 , MGS4 , Tekken 6 , HELLBOY (WOOTERSVILE best comic series ever XD ) , Rain (aka vampires rain but yeah i have my vampy fetishes MUAHAHA can anyone say bloodrayne ) and of course thank god for square on the rpg front with 3 FF13 titles (two for ps3 and one for psp) i havent really seen much rpg mentions for ps3 well nothing concrete or good so square will have to save the day . i already preordered my ps3 at fye obviously they wont get it first before main game chains stores such as gamestop but atleast i know i will definitly be one of the first to have one when they get them (so many ppl will be preordering at gamestop adn dont even mention walmart becuz they get even less copies then gamestop and toys r us wont be able to hold many units either ) but yeah i got the 60 gig reserved but ill prolly end up buying a 300 gig hard drive on my own and swamping them ALSO i hate immerson for taking away my rumble in my controlers DOOM ON YOU PPL heh funny thing is they have a new rumble tech and want sony to use it in there controlers HEH so what , sue sony and then make more money off them by selling yer techs BLEGH sony doesnt need ya they will do fine without it hey if anyone of u have seen the demos of the game 8 days wow the game footage is awesome how it moves from movie scens to gameply so smoothly u cna barely tell the diffrence well for now thats my rant let me know what your opions are on anything on ps3 , and plz if u are a sony hater u may say your piece about how much u love xbox blah blah blah well yeah just dont fill this thread up with xbox spam specialy since u thats right YOU MR XBOX LOVER are posting in a ps3 thread so respect this thread liek how u wont see me posting hate spam in xbox threads :
|
|
|
PS3
Jul 17, 2006 23:28:01 GMT -5
Post by Dragondrake on Jul 17, 2006 23:28:01 GMT -5
The PS3 is way too expensive. I thought it was a good thing when F.F. moved to the P.S., but I think it's high time for a relocation. Sony's just gone mad.
What were you saying about two FF13 titles for PS3? I don't get that.
|
|
shido
New Member
Posts: 28
|
PS3
Jul 17, 2006 23:37:35 GMT -5
Post by shido on Jul 17, 2006 23:37:35 GMT -5
well on the pricing i have to agree and disagree i mean well sony needs to make money not to mention that blue ray and some of the other specs on it are suposed to justifye the costs (PSSSP they are also in need of money thanks to lawsuits) lol but after it comes out hopefully it will be worth it
as far as final fantasy goes there is final fantasy 13 and final fantasy 13 versus which are both for p3 and then final fantasy 13 for psp but i forget the name (ill post it later) but yeah basicly its 3 diffrent storylines that all are like combining stories . u dont have to play all 3 to get the story and be happy but playing each will bring u deeper into the storyline and give u a great view at all the characters and plots . think of like kingdom hearts , like lets say they made 3 kh games and each version was a full game but from a diffrent characters like one version was sora , another mickey or rikku , and another was kairi . you would get the story from all sides but of course sora is the most completel. but im very curious as to how square will pull this off .
as far as system change . i think its fine on playstaion . if square makes another series and puts it on xbox then thats cool but ff games have almost become like playstaion rpg namebrand basicly . i still cant wait for the second crystal chronicals on the wii tho (ANY BRAWL WOOT but damnit ps3 thread PS3 THREAD XD)
|
|
|
PS3
Jul 17, 2006 23:44:34 GMT -5
Post by Dragondrake on Jul 17, 2006 23:44:34 GMT -5
I used to think of FF as a Nintendo series, till 7. Therefore we've reached that magic number of change. lol, jk. Making three versions of the game is surprising. I'll have to look into it.
|
|
shido
New Member
Posts: 28
|
PS3
Jul 17, 2006 23:51:23 GMT -5
Post by shido on Jul 17, 2006 23:51:23 GMT -5
dont get me wrong nintendo did a great job with final fantasy but once it made the jumpt to playstaion the series became more comercial to a wide range of fans specialy since ff7 basicly changed the way all rpg games were made and played . i think playstation was just the perfect system for square mainly becuz if they did make their games for n64 and gc they would have to compete for spotage with the first party titles like mario and super smash etc etc . while on playstation they basicly took over rpgs and became the must have rpgs on playstaion console , kinda like how street fighter was the must have fighting series from nintendo to playstation then of course capcom stated droping the ball and thats when other series started taking off big aka tekken , doa , and even kof XD
|
|
|
PS3
Jul 19, 2006 17:41:32 GMT -5
Post by Dark Icelord on Jul 19, 2006 17:41:32 GMT -5
i think playstation was just the perfect system for square mainly becuz if they did make their games for n64 and gc they would have to compete for spotage with the first party titles like mario and super smash etc etc . while on playstation they basicly took over rpgs and became the must have rpgs on playstaion console The F.F. games would have been fine on the N64 or GCN because there wasn't really any RPG games to compete with. Sure they would of had to compete with games like Zelda, Mario, and Super Smash Bros. but there were lots of other games on PS1 and PS2 that would compete with the F.F. series still like the Metal Gear Solid series, the Katamari games, Ico and Shadow of the Colossus and other games too. That is why I think that Nintendo would be fine if not better for Square Enix than Sony. Now you may be thinking "but the graphics that Sony have are better than Nintendo's". This is what I think. WHO CARES ABOUT GRAPHICS!?! I don't care if a game looks really REALLY bad if the gameplay is good. A great example of this would be NetHack, the game with really bad graphics but great gameplay. Another great example of this is D&D. D&D has no graphics. You are lucky if you get a map while playing D&D and yet it is a great game. This is the reason I am getting the Wii. Because I care more about gameplay than graphics, and I don't have $600 on me.
|
|
|
PS3
Jul 19, 2006 21:01:55 GMT -5
Post by Dragondrake on Jul 19, 2006 21:01:55 GMT -5
Yup, graphics are generally second to gameplay...unless you're watching a movie (lol). That's why I prefer GBA and DS games over console games.
However, I would like to disagree on whether N64 could've handled the F.F. series. It seems to me that the games couldn't have had prerendered BGs if it was on N64, and that would've been bad back in the day. Could you imagine shoddy F.F. Backgrounds? But now, there wouldn't be any problem. Gamecube could handle the games okay, I figure.
|
|
shido
New Member
Posts: 28
|
PS3
Jul 19, 2006 23:02:39 GMT -5
Post by shido on Jul 19, 2006 23:02:39 GMT -5
i couldnt see the great games of square go on gc or 64 im srry but it just couldnt happen for one thing the controls on ps2 are way better and the gc rpgs ( ive played a few) my biggest issue was controls and game play not graphics . but take a game like ffx i doubt very much so that it would hav ebeen as big as it was on a gc . and if ff7 had been on 64 the ff series prolly would have died and there . the gc in my opinon is built more for multiplayership with friends ( IE chrystal chronicals ) then hardcore solo gameplay (most ffs) . now before u mention fantasy star i would just like to say its an ok rpg untill u play with other ppl wether its online or with friends it isnt untill then that it becomes a good game .
|
|
|
PS3
Jul 19, 2006 23:15:45 GMT -5
Post by Dragondrake on Jul 19, 2006 23:15:45 GMT -5
I've found good RPGs on the 'Cube. To me, it's really the game that decides the controls, and not the system.
Now, I wonder if 7 on N64 would've really killed the series. That's unlikely, even the FF movie didn't kill the series. RPGs might've not become so popular in America. More likely than not, it would've been PS, and not FF that would've died.
P.S. I didn't like FF7 so much as the rest because the dialogue was nigh nonunderstandable. Is Cloud a Sephiroth clone or not? Probably the problem was that a lot of people left the project mid-development. Besides that, the game was fine. IX's the best of them for me.
|
|
shido
New Member
Posts: 28
|
PS3
Jul 19, 2006 23:22:25 GMT -5
Post by shido on Jul 19, 2006 23:22:25 GMT -5
i will admit the ff7 storyline is hard to comprehend at times but in my opion will remain the best rpg ever, a remake with updated graphics a few tweaks in battle system and voice actor dialog will make it golden agian . cloud isnt a sephi clone just was experimented on and injected with jenova cells . but yeah rpgs will always remain no matter the system . i stick with my theory that suare wouldnt have done half as good on n54 or gc . and while u might say it started on nintendo , did it really have a choice at the time ? one of the main rasons why sony has done so well with their consols is becuz they arent stuck with one type of game . most ppl u ask about nintendo will complain that its stagnant with its childish aimed games , and most ppl will complain about how xbox is full of fps trying to be the next halo . while u can complain and argue alot about the ps2 one thing is a fact its library of games and genres make it so that any gamer of any type can find a game that would suit them .
|
|
|
PS3
Jul 19, 2006 23:39:30 GMT -5
Post by Dragondrake on Jul 19, 2006 23:39:30 GMT -5
But where would be my Zelda? lol
The PS2 is great, most certainly. I'm disappointed that both Sony and Microsoft have such a large amount of M games, but it's not too bad.
|
|
shido
New Member
Posts: 28
|
PS3
Jul 20, 2006 0:09:29 GMT -5
Post by shido on Jul 20, 2006 0:09:29 GMT -5
well all in all ps3 will be the same dominance that ps one had over the dc and n64 . ps3 will auto maticaly be up above wii in sales (after the initial launch of course XD) becuz while the wii looks like a great system it cant compete with ps3 on almost any level . and as for xbox ps3 is not only just a tad bit more powerful (from specs reports , granted sony reports but still XD ) and not only that but it is now moving in on the 360s terriotory as far as xbox live goes and being able to run yer xbox like a computer . only diffrence between the two would be controler and title variety which might not matter in the end if u just dl emulators to the syster but on the other hand sony has so much compatability with many things which makes it a more practical all in all system to have. not to mention while xbox is getting games from major heavy companies sony has a huge line up of heavey hitter titles from these pudlishers on every genre type . and while xbox might be able to get its hands on some of these games even then sony will have moredl extra content for the games then xbox and cheaper too ( so i hear )
|
|
|
PS3
Jul 20, 2006 0:27:27 GMT -5
Post by Dark Icelord on Jul 20, 2006 0:27:27 GMT -5
Well I bet that alot of people will get the Wii over the PS3 because the Wii will cost $250 and the PS3 will cost $600. You can buy two Wiis for $100 less than the PS3. You can buy a Wii and a 360 for only $50 more than the PS3.
I also think that the Wii will be alot better in the online aspect because the online for the Wii will cost nothing at all, unlike the PS3.
Also Nintendo makes lots of child friendly games because they try to appeal to everybody, not just the Hardcore gamers and perverted gamers who buy games like DOAX but not to play volleyball. Nintendo also still has good non childish games like Resident Evil 4, Metroid Prime 2, and The Legend of Zelda Twilight Princess.
P.S. Did you know that most people plan on getting two next gen systems this time around. One of them being the 360 or the PS3 and the other being the Wii. So if Microsoft and Sony spilt sales Nintendo should sell more right?
|
|
shido
New Member
Posts: 28
|
PS3
Jul 20, 2006 3:24:03 GMT -5
Post by shido on Jul 20, 2006 3:24:03 GMT -5
to adgree ya , but keep in mind that the wii isnt competing with ps3 or xbox this time around its out to just sell . nintendo wasnt dumb with lowing its prices and as such it will sell more but that doesnt make it a better sstem in the long run . gc has always cost less then a ps2 but ps2 sell more then all other systems combined , why is that? simply becuz ps2 was a more playable system for games , u dont have to be a pervert to want to play a M rated game and if u want to play one u should have a good selection of games to choose from . nintendo hasnt offered that on any system . of course everyone is saying th ps3 is too exspensive now but they said that about ps and ps2 and just like those system once the ps3 comes out and proves to be the overall better system more ppl will start saying "hmmmm should i spend 600 bucks for two systems and still not have everything or spend 60 bucks and get everything plus so much more " and btw the wii online isnt free not the good part of it anyways . wii's whole sales slogan on being online is marketed around u being able to play so many old games , well thats great if u feel like spending ten bucks a shot and while at first this might seem great but in the end while u are playing the oringinal zelda on a next gen console ps3 owners will have a built blue ray player , iinterchangeable hardrive for more then gaming experience , REAL next gen games with next gen graphics and online play , including downloadable extras to keep games fresh ,connectivity to so many more devices that even its been speculated that might be able to link with non sony products including 350 and nintendo ware . not to mention the psp is going to shine with the ps3 being able to transmit photos video and music back and forth between the ps3 and psp even while u are oout of town or even state. not to mention that while u are paying ten bucks to dl games of yonder on the wii i could dl an emulator onto my ps3 and dl nintendo dream cast n64 nes , sega saturn genesis and even ps2 /xbox/xbox 360 games onto my ps3 and play for free and to take it much further can even use the ps3 as a multi media center for movies with the blue ray still plays dvds , music and videos dl from the internet OR straight form digital camera . not to mention the games are revolutionary jus the controler it self is a big thing and while its controler is just a small feature comppared to the ps3 as a whole package the wiis main selling point is the controler ,. does anyone see a problem there? even games realeashed on both ps3 and 360 will both be played diffrently thanks to the motion sensitive controler allowing for a more free fluid movent in character and more freedom to the player with actual button pressing .what will happen is you will have to buy the wii then buy a dvd player seperate and an ipod seperate or buy an external hard drive fpr yer computer just to store all teh files and not to mention the wii is wifi XD how many ppl world wide use wifi? granted its a growing source for consumers but lets face it to connect with your wi u now have to go out and buy a 100 dollar router strong enuf to keep game play smoth it would really suck to be playing online and have everyoen vote u out of a room becuz u are laggin horridably becuz of low wifi output. and xbox isnt a competitor really WOOT they sell in america im glad for micro soft but if u look world wide goats have a better chance of selling . xbox cant sell in japan and the uk has been deemed sony land ever since the ps2 dropped . so while xbox is doing really well over here as a whole they are competing worldwide . bo let me break it down real quick on the psp . obviously not selling as much as the ds but in truth thats sonys fault for not getting on the game ball faster . just like with ps3 vs all other systems the ds is betetr then psp becuz of game library it has such as huge variety . and if u ask me its really sad to claim nintendo as the best home consol systen when they only way they can compete with sony is to use the handgheld earnings . everything is going to be sony soon . even from a money stand point ok ps3 is too much for u then buy the 500 dollar one and as far as ps2 and psp go when ps3 drops both systems will be getting a price cut and then say goodbye to ds pwnage . not to mention square is about to make its whole fan base become sony lovers with core crisi droping with the ps3 ad then ff 13 two for ps3 and then one for psp. and not only that but oblivion one of the greatest games on xbox will be changing sides to ps3 as well but not of course without a lot more added features and change in gameplay.only ppl who wont buy a ps3 are ppl with an xbox .....well not even becuz if u checked gamestops earning sn stuff they are recieincg more and more ppl trading in their 360s and trying to reserve ps3s . but loyal fans of xb wont and those who dont want to spend money. thats it everyone else will be saving up for it. and after it comes out even mroe ppl will be droloing to have one . tell u the truth only reason i WOULD get xb is for doa (WOOT THATS RIGHT IMA A PERVERT MUHAHAH HA) and thats about it . and the only ONLY reason im getting a ds/wii (after the ds has a price drop ofcourse or i find one used ) is for pokemon d/p / battle revolution and smash brawl THATS IT 3 games as a gamer i cant live my whole gaming life off of three games im srry so after my ps3 is saftly on my lap by xmas ill see if i get a ds along with pokemon d/p for my bd is not i cna wait till summer when i have sum extra cash lieing around !!!!!! wooo thats a mouth ful cnat wiat for responces XD
|
|
|
PS3
Jul 21, 2006 17:29:06 GMT -5
Post by Dark Icelord on Jul 21, 2006 17:29:06 GMT -5
I just think that Sony doubled their sales when they screwed up on the first PS2 and everyone had to re-buy them.
I wasn't talking about all M rated games in general. I was talking about games like DOAX and GTA, those games are very BAD in their own way.
I have no idea what world you are living in but Nintendo has a great selection of games to choose from ranging from rated E to rated M, try and find that on another system.
I was talking about the Wii being able to play games online against other people for free, unlike the PS3 and 360.
I wouldn't download games like Zelda, (I own all the Zelda games ;D) I would download all the hard to find really good games like Soulblazer, and I don't want more than a gaming experience, if I want that I will use a computer. I buy game systems to play games.
If you plan on doing that you better hope that they have PS3s in jail. Downloading emulators for free is illegal, unless maybe if you own the original.
Like I said before I buy game systems to play games. How many people do you think will have a PS3 but not also have a DVD player and a computer with Internet and camera hookup?
I see no problem there. The Wii's controller will be revolutionary.
You do know that a Wii, a DVD player and an MP3 player altogether will cost less than a PS3, and you don't need an external hard drive to store files. Oh and Nintendo sells a Wifi adapter that can give you a Wifi connection.
The router that Nintendo makes will only cost like $50.
All this is why I think the Wii will be better than the 360 and PS3. Go Wii!!! Oh, but the PS3 still looks good.
|
|